In my last few posts, I discussed my concern with meeting deadlines, coordinating with groups, and combating burnout. These are all still very much at the forefront of my mind, but I want to take a break thinking about those things and instead talk about something different, but not unrelated to Engineering.
Within the past week, I’ve attended three separate networking/professional development events: a Philadelphia Chapter ASME Awards Banquet, an alumni panel for SHPE, and a Women in STEM panel for SWE. It was a lot of networking in a short amount of time, and by the time I got to the ASME banquet (just this Tuesday), I must admit that I wasn’t much in the mood to socialize, and didn’t take advantage of the opportunity as I should have. However, I wonder if perhaps part of why I didn’t socialize as much at that event had as much to do with the environment as it did with my own energy levels.
Before I elaborate, I’ll give a quick rundown on each of these professional organizations for those of you that may not be familiar with the acronyms:
ASME – American Society of Mechanical Engineers
SHPE – Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers
SWE – Society of Women Engineer
While all three of these organizations are wonderful resources, I find myself drawn especially toward SWE and SHPE–and even though I am not from a minority group, I find that aspects of both my gender and background intersect with those of minority groups. Especially in a field dominated by white men, it’s easier for me to relate to other women and minorities who have faced challenges that the majority in the field haven’t. I’d like to focus this post particularly on women in engineering, as I identify as a woman, but I will also draw connections with minorities.
I try to avoid being political, however when it comes to the representation of women and minorities in STEM, I believe it’s not a matter of politics, but of an untapped resource. Innovation often comes from taking a different perspective, or understanding a need that’s been unfulfilled. To that end, wouldn’t it be better to have a diverse group working on a project, rather than a group of people with similar backgrounds?
Truthfully, I’m fortunate enough that most of the people I’ve encountered in my education and my internship have been open-minded and supportive of peers regardless of background, gender, etc. The people here at Temple are a pretty diverse group (compared to my first go at university back in Wisconsin, where there were very few ‘non-traditional’ students and minorities were still underrepresented), and while I appreciate it, I still find myself looking around my classes to see that women only represent about 20-30% of my classmates. Attending the ASME banquet Tuesday night, I felt that difference much more acutely–Temple’s ASME representation was split pretty evenly between men and women, but the rest of the students and professionals were by majority men.

This is by no means a complaint about ASME itself, but it served as a stark reminder of the lack of diversity currently in the field.
I subscribe to Dr. Ferrar’s Intentional Academy emails, and one of his recent emails discussed ‘biases,’ and how there are still people who aren’t ‘part of the conversation’ in certain things. I think, absolutely, women and minorities are underrepresented, especially engineering, and for me this is an important issue. Why? I touched on this subject in a previous post, about how I came to decide to pursue engineering, and how it didn’t even occur to me until later in life, because I had no role models to see myself in this position. There’s also another aspect to this, which I heard echoed by the guests at the SWE and SHPE panels: Imposter Syndrome.
I think that, by now, there has been enough research to back Imposter Syndrome as a very real thing. When we don’t see ourselves represented in a field, it’s easy to think I’m a fraud, or I don’t belong here. Sometimes even feeling as though everyone else is smarter than you–ever sat next to an Honors student with straight A’s and felt completely inadequate?–is enough to knock you down a few pegs. I often have to remind myself that I’m pretty damn smart, too, because even if I’m not at the same level as an Honors student, I know engineering requires no small amount of intelligence.
The SHPE and SWE panels gave me a chance to connect with people going through the same challenges–and that common background made it easier to talk to them freely. While I have no doubt that the gentleman at ASME would be anything but welcoming and friendly, I was more hesitant to connect with them without that common background. I’d like to change that about myself, and I’d like to see to it that future engineers don’t have to face those same difficulties. I want to see equal representation, and the innovation that comes from a group filled with diverse perspectives.
I know what I can do to try to move in that direction. I will continue to be a strong proponent for women in STEM and be involved with SWE and other orgs to do outreach activities with minority groups and young children. But I challenge you to ask yourself: what can you do to help push us towards closing the gap for underrepresented groups? What can you do to make sure your projects reflect the diversity present in the real world?
If you’ve stuck around for this long, thank you for your time! I hope you can help us take steps forward in having a more inclusive, diverse group in Engineering or your respective field. Until then, let me leave you with this:










